Skip to main content

Year-end

 Year-end brings accounting factors not often considered during the year when interim reports are generated. If you are performing the following tasks on a monthly basis, you are probably not doing it with a 10% administration fee. 

Let’s start with depreciation of capital assets and the  corresponding amortization of donation revenue where applicable. While this is often performed once at year-end, you could calculate these at the beginning of the year and allocate during the period using reoccurring entries. Remember, though, you will need to consider additions and disposals which occur during the year.


Next, many of you have bi-weekly payroll which means the first pay after year-end will include days which belong to the prior year requiring an accrual in old year and a reversal in new. Some systems are able to do this monthly if the feature is available and used correctly.


From there, we reevaluate leave balances by program such as sick and annual, and adjust the liabilities up or down accordingly, the opposing entries against your salary expenses. 


From there we may have to realign common services such as Administration and Facilities. Remember, facilites costs for areas where you carry out program delivery are not Administration, they are a program cost.


Next, we look at programs with deficits to see if we have deferred revenue available, and what the terms are regarding this according to your agreement.


If we do not have deferred revenue to cover a program deficit and the funder will not assist with the shortfall, where can you find other funding sources such as general donations, fundraising initiatives or interest revenue?


Finally, if you have a surplus in a program, return it to deferred where warranted, and refer to the funding agreement regarding disposition.


In closing, while you may have people who will take care of all this for you, you must understand how this works, and appreciate reasonable timelines. 


Get business savvy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Span of Control

How many people can you manage effectively? Although some textbooks will say you can effectively manage 5-7 employees, reputable ones will then qualify this with lengthy discussions on why this does not even qualify as a guideline. Last week I had a client initiate a discussion about whether or not to create and staff a new director position; during the conversation, he told me he was not certain he needed the position as other than his own assistant, a receptionist, and the accounting and human resources managers, he only had four other direct reports, and they were all strong managers. For those counting, this adds to eight which is on the outside of the theoretical formula. The reality is, one person can effectively manage many people if they are all the same profession, performing similar tasks, have similar competencies, and are working in the same location; but what about situations where each is a different profession with different roles, and at different work locations? For ex...

Serving the public is a business

  The nonprofit and public service sectors are often misunderstood when it comes to their place in the business world and the transferability of the skills of those who work in the industry. When most people think of the term ‘business’ they associate it with buying, making, or doing something with the intention of selling it and turning a profit which they will either reinvest into another earning endeavor, or spend on either a life sustaining need, or a frivolous want. Businesses normally require an investor of sorts who uses either their own money or that of others, to purchase the necessary infrastructure and materials, and hope it ends well otherwise they are in trouble. However, there is another type of business which although does not include an investor who aims to earn a profit, still participates in making or doing something, the activities of which have financial implications. This is the nonprofit and public sector.  So, why do I consider nonprofit a ‘business?’ Si...

Not-for-proft Financial Management - Means to an end inverted

A significant difference between private and public sector is what I call ‘means to an end inverted’ where in private sector, the thing you do is the means to an end which is money; in the public sector, money is the means to an end which is the thing you do. That being said, serving the public is a business when you are being paid for a deliverable.   Schools, service organizations, sporting clubs, emergency services, and social welfare programs all have two things in common: they are there to provide citizens or members a service, and they are accountable to the funders. Whether the program is funded through federal, state/provincial or local taxes, or through donations, service fees, or membership dues, the concept is the same.   Why is the inversion of Means to an End important for those who operate in the nonprofit and public service sectors? It has to do with the philosophy of why you do what you do, and if you are doing it for the right reasons. Entrepreneurs are th...