Skip to main content

Diversification can be your enemy

 While almost every financial professional will tell you to diversify your portfolio, both investment and service or goods offerings, there are times where this can lead to higher Administration and Management costs in both for-profit and not-for-profit organizations.


Most of us have heard the term ‘Span of Control’ being how many staff one person can effectively manage, a common quote being 5-7. This topic has such a high ‘It Depends’ factor, in my opinion this ratio is only valid for introducing the concept.


Let’s consider a few examples.


One program with 100 delivery officers may require one Manager and 7 assistant managers as Span of Control can be stretched from the commonly quoted 1:5-7 ratio to 1:15 if all persons are performing similar tasks requiring similar qualifications. Contrast this to an organization with 100 employees, 6 major areas, and multiple programs with distinctively different occupations and skill requirements. For example, an Assistant Warden Management Services of a Penitentiary who is responsible for Accounting, Human Resources, Contracting and Procurement, Warehousing and Material Management, Facilities Management, Administration, and Food Services. Each of the above requires a division head who specializes in their profession, and even within those there are specialties such as the Facilities Manager who supervises electricians, plumbers, heating plant operators, general labourers, and an automotive mechanic. Given the multiple departments listed above, then add in various supervisors within the sub-elements, there will be far more leadership positions layered on top of the 100 workers than the 7 assistant managers articulated in the first example. 


Now compare the above to Social Service Organization ‘A’ who operates 1 program being supportive housing with 5 facilities using 100 employees, to organization ‘B’ who has 100 employees in 5 distinctively different divisions, 30 different programs, with sub-programs of programs. Both A and B having the same Revenue thus Administration fee, but each requiring different levels of management and administrative support.


As I mentioned earlier, Diversification can be your enemy when it causes you to add layers of supervision, which your funder(s) may or may not be willing to support.


Looking at this from another angle, Diversification also means not being focused on one or two related areas. Is having your mind wandering in different directions versus concentrating your attention in one or two related areas good for your organization and the people you serve? Will this lead you to become a ‘Jack of all trades and master of none?’ While the original meaning of this phrase is positive in that a multidisciplinary knowledge base has its advantages, if spreading yourself too thin, you can lose sight of details which can mean the difference between success and failure for both you and your clients.


My book Means to an end inverted - Financial management of not-for-profit and publicly funded organizations, as well as course Business Basics for Not-for-profit Organizations are coming soon. 


Follow my webpage, Linkedin account, and blog for more information.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Span of Control

How many people can you manage effectively? Although some textbooks will say you can effectively manage 5-7 employees, reputable ones will then qualify this with lengthy discussions on why this does not even qualify as a guideline. Last week I had a client initiate a discussion about whether or not to create and staff a new director position; during the conversation, he told me he was not certain he needed the position as other than his own assistant, a receptionist, and the accounting and human resources managers, he only had four other direct reports, and they were all strong managers. For those counting, this adds to eight which is on the outside of the theoretical formula. The reality is, one person can effectively manage many people if they are all the same profession, performing similar tasks, have similar competencies, and are working in the same location; but what about situations where each is a different profession with different roles, and at different work locations? For ex...

Not-for-proft Financial Management - Means to an end inverted

A significant difference between private and public sector is what I call ‘means to an end inverted’ where in private sector, the thing you do is the means to an end which is money; in the public sector, money is the means to an end which is the thing you do. That being said, serving the public is a business when you are being paid for a deliverable.   Schools, service organizations, sporting clubs, emergency services, and social welfare programs all have two things in common: they are there to provide citizens or members a service, and they are accountable to the funders. Whether the program is funded through federal, state/provincial or local taxes, or through donations, service fees, or membership dues, the concept is the same.   Why is the inversion of Means to an End important for those who operate in the nonprofit and public service sectors? It has to do with the philosophy of why you do what you do, and if you are doing it for the right reasons. Entrepreneurs are th...

Serving the public is a business

  The nonprofit and public service sectors are often misunderstood when it comes to their place in the business world and the transferability of the skills of those who work in the industry. When most people think of the term ‘business’ they associate it with buying, making, or doing something with the intention of selling it and turning a profit which they will either reinvest into another earning endeavor, or spend on either a life sustaining need, or a frivolous want. Businesses normally require an investor of sorts who uses either their own money or that of others, to purchase the necessary infrastructure and materials, and hope it ends well otherwise they are in trouble. However, there is another type of business which although does not include an investor who aims to earn a profit, still participates in making or doing something, the activities of which have financial implications. This is the nonprofit and public sector.  So, why do I consider nonprofit a ‘business?’ Si...